Bibliometrics: Foreign Ownership 2022

1 Initial Corpus generation

2 General Overview over EIST articles

2.1 Main Indicators: Publications, Authors, Countries

To start with, a general overview over the documents in the corpus.

MAIN INFORMATION ABOUT DATA

 Timespan                              1981 : 2022 
 Sources (Journals, Books, etc)        1133 
 Documents                             5350 
 Average years from publication        4.91 
 Average citations per documents       2.564 
 Average citations per year per doc    0.3921 
 References                            243089 
 
DOCUMENT TYPES                     
 article        5326 
 editorial      5 
 review         19 
 
DOCUMENT CONTENTS
 Keywords Plus (ID)                    2563 
 Author's Keywords (DE)                10263 
 
AUTHORS
 Authors                               9452 
 Author Appearances                    13762 
 Authors of single-authored documents  830 
 Authors of multi-authored documents   8622 
 
AUTHORS COLLABORATION
 Single-authored documents             918 
 Documents per Author                  0.566 
 Authors per Document                  1.77 
 Co-Authors per Documents              2.57 
 Collaboration Index                   1.95 
 

Annual Scientific Production

Annual Percentage Growth Rate 17.17457 


Most Productive Authors

Top manuscripts per citations

Corresponding Author's Countries

SCP: Single Country Publications

MCP: Multiple Country Publications


Total Citations per Country

Most Relevant Sources

Most Relevant Keywords

NA

And a graphical visualization

2.2 Cited references

Top 20 cited references (by corpus documents):

CR	n
JENSEN, M.C., MECKLING, W.H., THEORY OF THE FIRM: MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR, AGENCY COSTS AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE (1976) JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 3 (4), PP. 305-360	362
VILLALONGA, B., AMIT, R., HOW DO FAMILY OWNERSHIP, CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT AFFECT FIRM VALUE? (2006) JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 80 (2), PP. 385-417	217
BERRONE, P., CRUZ, C., GOMEZ-MEJIA, L.R., SOCIOEMOTIONAL WEALTH IN FAMILY FIRMS: THEORETICAL DIMENSIONS, ASSESSMENT APPROACHES, AND AGENDA FOR FUTURE RESEARCH (2012) FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW, 25 (3), PP. 258-279	195
BARNEY, J., FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE (1991) JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 17 (1), PP. 99-120	190
CHUA, J.H., CHRISMAN, J.J., SHARMA, P., DEFINING THE FAMILY BUSINESS BY BEHAVIOR (1999) ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 23 (4), PP. 19-39	187
SIRMON, D.G., HITT, M.A., MANAGING RESOURCES: LINKING UNIQUE RESOURCES, MANAGEMENT, AND WEALTH CREATION IN FAMILY FIRMS (2003) ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 27 (4), PP. 339-358	182
KOGUT, B., SINGH, H., THE EFFECT OF NATIONAL CULTURE ON THE CHOICE OF ENTRY MODE (1988) JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 19 (3), PP. 411-432	174
LUO, Y., TUNG, R.L., INTERNATIONAL EXPANSION OF EMERGING MARKET ENTERPRISES: A SPRINGBOARD PERSPECTIVE (2007) JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 38 (4), PP. 481-498	170
SCHULZE, W.S., LUBATKIN, M.H., DINO, R.N., BUCHHOLTZ, A.K., AGENCY RELATIONSHIPS IN FAMILY FIRMS: THEORY AND EVIDENCE (2001) ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 12 (2), PP. 99-116	159
JENSEN, M.C., MECKLING, W.H., THEORY OF THE FIRM: MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR, AGENCY COSTS AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE (1976) JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 3, PP. 305-360	147
HABBERSHON, T.G., WILLIAMS, M.L., A RESOURCE-BASED FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE STRATEGIC ADVANTAGES OF FAMILY FIRMS (1999) FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW, 12 (1), PP. 1-25	138
MILLER, D., LE BRETON-MILLER, I., FAMILY GOVERNANCE AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: AGENCY, STEWARDSHIP, AND CAPABILITIES (2006) FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW, 19 (1), PP. 73-87	135
ADAMS, R.B., FERREIRA, D., WOMEN IN THE BOARDROOM AND THEIR IMPACT ON GOVERNANCE AND PERFORMANCE (2009) JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 94 (2), PP. 291-309	129
LUO, Y., XUE, Q., HAN, B., HOW EMERGING MARKET GOVERNMENTS PROMOTE OUTWARD FDI: EXPERIENCE FROM CHINA (2010) JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 45 (1), PP. 68-79	129
LA PORTA, R., LOPEZ-DE-SILANES, F., SHLEIFER, A., CORPORATE OWNERSHIP AROUND THE WORLD (1999) THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 54 (2), PP. 471-517	124
, &LDQUO	122
DEMSETZ, H., LEHN, K., THE STRUCTURE OF CORPORATE OWNERSHIP: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES (1985) JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 93, PP. 1155-1177	120
BUCKLEY, P.J., CLEGG, L.J., CROSS, A.R., LIU, X., VOSS, H., ZHENG, P., THE DETERMINANTS OF CHINESE OUTWARD FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT (2007) JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 38 (4), PP. 499-518	119
CHILD, J., RODRIGUES, S.B., THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CHINESE FIRMS: A CASE FOR THEORETICAL EXTENSION? (2005) MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION REVIEW, 1 (3), PP. 381-410	119
SHLEIFER, A., VISHNY, R.W., A SURVEY OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (1997) THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 52 (2), PP. 737-783	118

3 Topic modelling

I by now created some topic modelling. The results are now more fine-tuned, but there is still room for some improvement. We ran a LDA on the titles + abstracts of our corpus, aiming at identifying 6 topics (different evaluation methods point towards this number)

3.1 Topics by topwords

This might still be finetuned, but initially doesnt look that bad I think. All the topics for me seem to be somewhat identifiable. We should maybe start naming them to make their interpretation later easier.

3.2 Topics over time

`summarise()` has grouped output by 'PY'. You can override using the `.groups` argument.

3.3 LDAViz

Here you find a nice way of exploring topics via the LDAVIz methodology of visulizing the result of an LDA. It dispolays all topics in a 2 dimensional TSNE (similar to PCA, but optimized for graphical illustration in 2d), and also gives a nice visual representation over the topics top-word distribution and overall frequencies of this words in the corpus. The \(\lambda\) parameter regulates the importance-ordering of the topwords. High \(\lambda\) order words by the highest propability to appear in the topic to the lowest (independent of the overall word popularity in the corpus), whle low \(\lambda\) emphasize words which are very specific to the topic, and rarely appear in others.

Play a bit around. Since it would be here a bit condensed, here in fullscreen for a better overview.

4 Knowledge Bases: Co-Citation network analysis

Note: This analysis refers the co-citation analysis, where the cited references and not the original publications are the unit of analysis. See tab Technical descriptionfor additional explanations

4.1 Knowledge Bases summary

4.1.1 Main Indicators

In order to partition networks into components or clusters, we deploy a community detection technique based on the Lovain Algorithm (Blondel et al., 2008). The Lovain Algorithm is a heuristic method that attempts to optimize the modularity of communities within a network by maximizing within- and minimizing between-community connectivity. We identify the following communities = knowledge bases.

It is not the main focus of this exercise, but still informative to see which historical knowledge the fields draws from.

NOTE: Up to now I only report the most central members per community

com	name	dgr_int	dgr
1	SIRMON D.G. HITT M.A. MANAGING RESOURCES: LINKING UNIQUE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND WEALTH CREATION IN FAMILY FIRMS (2003)	10079	12869
1	VILLALONGA B. AMIT R. HOW DO FAMILY OWNERSHIP CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT AFFECT FIRM VALUE? (2006)	9256	12555
1	CHUA J.H. CHRISMAN J.J. SHARMA P. DEFINING THE FAMILY BUSINESS BY BEHAVIOR (1999)	8353	10273
1	ANDERSON R.C. REEB D.M. FOUNDING-FAMILY OWNERSHIP AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM THE S&P 500 (2003)	7660	10134
1	SCHULZE W.S. LUBATKIN M.H. DINO R.N. BUCHHOLTZ A.K. AGENCY RELATIONSHIPS IN FAMILY FIRMS: THEORY AND EVIDENCE (2001)	6299	7212
1	BERRONE P. CRUZ C. GOMEZ-MEJIA L.R. SOCIOEMOTIONAL WEALTH IN FAMILY FIRMS: THEORETICAL DIMENSIONS ASSESSMENT APPROACHES AND AGENDA FOR FUTURE RESEA...	6292	7285
1	CARNEY M. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FAMILY-CONTROLLED FIRMS (2005)	4889	5975
1	HABBERSHON T.G. WILLIAMS M.L. A RESOURCE-BASED FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE STRATEGIC ADVANTAGES OF FAMILY FIRMS (1999)	4796	5583
1	GOMEZ-MEJIA L.R. CRUZ C. BERRONE P. DE CASTRO J. THE BIND THAT TIES: SOCIOEMOTIONAL WEALTH PRESERVATION IN FAMILY FIRMS (2011)	4425	4972
1	CHRISMAN J.J. PATEL P.C. VARIATIONS IN R&D INVESTMENTS OF FAMILY AND NONFAMILY FIRMS: BEHAVIORAL AGENCY AND MYOPIC LOSS AVERSION PERSPECTIVES (2012)	4357	4927
2	JENSEN M.C. MECKLING W.H. THEORY OF THE FIRM: MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR AGENCY COSTS AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE (1976)	6315	15366
2	SHLEIFER A. VISHNY R.W. A SURVEY OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (1997)	4073	5965
2	LA PORTA R. LOPEZ-DE-SILANES F. SHLEIFER A. CORPORATE OWNERSHIP AROUND THE WORLD (1999)	4000	9410
2	SHLEIFER A. VISHNY R.W. LARGE SHAREHOLDERS AND CORPORATE CONTROL (1986)	3609	4465
2	JENSEN M.C. AGENCY COSTS OF FREE CASH FLOW CORPORATE FINANCE AND TAKEOVERS (1986)	2678	3618
2	CHEN X. HARFORD J. LI K. MONITORING: WHICH INSTITUTIONS MATTER? (2007)	2583	2719
2	DEMSETZ H. LEHN K. THE STRUCTURE OF CORPORATE OWNERSHIP: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES (1985)	2495	4254
2	AGGARWAL R. EREL I. FERREIRA M. MATOS P. DOES GOVERNANCE TRAVEL AROUND THE WORLD? EVIDENCE FROM INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS (2011)	2355	2460
2	GOMPERS P. ISHII J. METRICK A. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND EQUITY PRICES (2003)	2327	2570
2	BUSHEE B.J. THE INFLUENCE OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ON MYOPIC R&D INVESTMENT BEHAVIOR (1998)	2295	2500
3	LUO Y. TUNG R.L. INTERNATIONAL EXPANSION OF EMERGING MARKET ENTERPRISES: A SPRINGBOARD PERSPECTIVE (2007)	4202	4403
3	KOGUT B. SINGH H. THE EFFECT OF NATIONAL CULTURE ON THE CHOICE OF ENTRY MODE (1988)	3297	3464
3	LUO Y. XUE Q. HAN B. HOW EMERGING MARKET GOVERNMENTS PROMOTE OUTWARD FDI: EXPERIENCE FROM CHINA (2010)	3000	3091
3	ZAHEER S. OVERCOMING THE LIABILITY OF FOREIGNNESS (1995)	2255	2677
3	MATHEWS J.A. DRAGON MULTINATIONALS: NEW PLAYERS IN 21ST CENTURY GLOBALIZATION (2006)	2252	2305
3	MEYER K.E. ESTRIN S. BHAUMIK S.K. PENG M.W. INSTITUTIONS RESOURCES AND ENTRY STRATEGIES IN EMERGING ECONOMIES (2009)	2193	2299
3	NORTH D.C. (1990)	2088	2508
3	CHILD J. RODRIGUES S.B. THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CHINESE FIRMS: A CASE FOR THEORETICAL EXTENSION? (2005)	2047	2107
3	BUCKLEY P.J. CLEGG L.J. CROSS A.R. LIU X. VOSS H. ZHENG P. THE DETERMINANTS OF CHINESE OUTWARD FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT (2007)	1935	1981
3	DENG P. WHY DO CHINESE FIRMS TEND TO ACQUIRE STRATEGIC ASSETS IN INTERNATIONAL EXPANSION? (2009)	1932	1967
4	GRAVES C. THOMAS J. DETERMINANTS OF THE INTERNATIONALIZATION PATHWAYS OF FAMILY FIRMS: AN EXAMINATION OF FAMILY INFLUENCE (2008)	1775	2905
4	FERNÁNDEZ Z. NIETO M.J. IMPACT OF OWNERSHIP ON THE INTERNATIONAL INVOLVEMENT OF SMES (2006)	1535	2965
4	KONTINEN T. OJALA A. THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF FAMILY BUSINESSES: A REVIEW OF EXTANT RESEARCH (2010)	1405	2383
4	GRAVES C. THOMAS J. INTERNATIONALISATION OF THE FAMILY BUSINESS: A LONGITUDINAL PERSPECTIVE (2004)	1213	1522
4	DE MASSIS A. FRATTINI F. MAJOCCHI A. PISCITELLO L. FAMILY FIRMS IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY: TOWARD A DEEPER UNDERSTANDING OF INTERNATIONALIZATION DETERM...	1209	2329
4	BARNEY J. FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE (1991)	1165	3686
4	FERNÁNDEZ Z. NIETO M.J. INTERNATIONALIZATION STRATEGY OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED FAMILY BUSINESSES: SOME INFLUENTIAL FACTORS (2005)	1164	2412
4	GALLO M.A. SVEEN J. INTERNATIONALIZING THE FAMILY BUSINESS: FACILITATING AND RESTRAINING FACTORS (1991)	1152	1629
4	PUKALL T.J. CALABRÒ A. THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF FAMILY FIRMS: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND INTEGRATIVE MODEL (2014)	1013	1988
4	CALABRÒ A. TORCHIA M. PUKALL T. MUSSOLINO D. THE INFLUENCE OF OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE AND BOARD STRATEGIC INVOLVEMENT ON INTERNATIONAL SALES: THE MODER...	981	1157
5	BARNEA A. RUBIN A. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AS A CONFLICT BETWEEN SHAREHOLDERS (2010)	1503	1977
5	SERVAES H. TAMAYO A. THE IMPACT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ON FIRM VALUE: THE ROLE OF CUSTOMER AWARENESS (2013)	1396	1577
5	CHENG B. IOANNOU I. SERAFEIM G. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ACCESS TO FINANCE (2014)	1192	1354
5	FERRELL A. LIANG H. RENNEBOOG L. SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FIRMS (2016)	1172	1347
5	GODFREY P.C. MERRILL C.B. HANSEN J.M. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SHAREHOLDER VALUE: AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE RISK...	1107	1378
5	LINS K.V. SERVAES H. TAMAYO A. SOCIAL CAPITAL TRUST AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: THE VALUE OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DURING THE FINANCIAL CRISIS ...	1103	1336
5	DI GIULI A. KOSTOVETSKY L. ARE RED OR BLUE COMPANIES MORE LIKELY TO GO GREEN? POLITICS AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (2014)	1058	1209
5	GODFREY P.C. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CORPORATE PHILANTHROPY AND SHAREHOLDER WEALTH: A RISK MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVE (2005)	1008	1340
5	MCWILLIAMS A. SIEGEL D. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: A THEORY OF THE FIRM PERSPECTIVE (2001)	973	1212
5	KRÜGER P. CORPORATE GOODNESS AND SHAREHOLDER WEALTH (2015)	958	1131
6	ADAMS R.B. FERREIRA D. WOMEN IN THE BOARDROOM AND THEIR IMPACT ON GOVERNANCE AND PERFORMANCE (2009)	3118	3853
6	CARTER D.A. SIMKINS B.J. SIMPSON W.G. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE BOARD DIVERSITY AND FIRM VALUE (2003)	1720	1897
6	BEAR S. RAHMAN N. POST C. THE IMPACT OF BOARD DIVERSITY AND GENDER COMPOSITION ON CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND FIRM REPUTATION (2010)	1657	2120
6	CAMPBELL K. MÍNGUEZ-VERA A. GENDER DIVERSITY IN THE BOARDROOM AND FIRM FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (2008)	1128	1300
6	GUL F.A. SRINIDHI B. NG A.C. DOES BOARD GENDER DIVERSITY IMPROVE THE INFORMATIVENESS OF STOCK PRICES? (2011)	984	1203
6	LIU Y. WEI Z. XIE F. DO WOMEN DIRECTORS IMPROVE FIRM PERFORMANCE IN CHINA? (2014)	967	1038
6	TORCHIA M. CALABRÒ A. HUSE M. WOMEN DIRECTORS ON CORPORATE BOARDS: FROM TOKENISM TO CRITICAL MASS (2011)	925	1110
6	TERJESEN S. SEALY R. SINGH V. WOMEN DIRECTORS ON CORPORATE BOARDS: A REVIEW AND RESEARCH AGENDA (2009)	909	982
6	POST C. BYRON K. WOMEN ON BOARDS AND FIRM FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS (2015)	883	935
6	ERHARDT N.L. WERBEL J.D. SHRADER C.B. BOARD OF DIRECTOR DIVERSITY AND FIRM FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (2003)	863	919

4.1.2 Development of Knowledge Bases

Warning in gzfile(file, "rb") :
  cannot open compressed file '../../temp/el_2m.RDS', probable reason 'No such file or directory'
Error in gzfile(file, "rb") : cannot open the connection

4.2 Technical description

In a co-cittion network, the strength of the relationship between a reference pair \(m\) and \(n\) (\(s_{m,n}^{coc}\)) is expressed by the number of publications \(C\) which are jointly citing reference \(m\) and \(n\).

\[s_{m,n}^{coc} = \sum_i c_{i,m} c_{i,n}\]

The intuition here is that references which are frequently cited together are likely to share commonalities in theory, topic, methodology, or context. It can be interpreted as a measure of similarity as evaluated by other researchers that decide to jointly cite both references. Because the publication process is time-consuming, co-citation is a backward-looking measure, which is appropriate to map the relationship between core literature of a field.

5 Research Areas: Bibliographic coupling analysis

5.1 Research Areas main summary

This is arguably the more interesting part. Here, we identify the literature’s current knowledge frontier by carrying out a bibliographic coupling analysis of the publications in our corpus. This measure uses bibliographical information of publications to establish a similarity relationship between them. Again, method details to be found in the tab Technical description. As you will see, we identify the more narrow research community of Sustainability Transitions (in which we will zoom in later), but also a set of adjacent research areas with some theoretical/methodological/application overlap.

5.1.1 Main Characteristics

To identify communities in the field’s knowledge frontier (labeled research areas) we again use the Lovain Algorithm (Blondel et al., 2008). We identify the following communities = research areas.

`summarise()` has grouped output by 'com'. You can override using the `.groups` argument.

Error in count(., com_bib, com_cit) : object 'el_2m' not found

com	com_name	topic_name
1	1	3
1	1	5
1	1	1
2	2	4
2	2	5
2	2	3
3	3	1
3	3	3
3	3	2
4	4	2
4	4	1
4	4	4
5	5	4
5	5	2
5	5	1
6	6	1
6	6	3
6	6	4
7	7	3
7	7	5
7	7	1
NA	NA	2
NA	NA	1
NA	NA	5

5.1.2 Categorization

I up to now gain only provide the 10 most central articles, which can be used to classify them

com_name	AU	PY	TI	dgr_int	TC	TC_year
1	CABRERA-SUÁREZ MK;MART...	2013	TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS AND PERFORMANCE IN NON-LISTED FAMILY FIRMS	1412	10	1.1111111
1	CABRERA-SUÁREZ MK;MART...	2013	TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS AND PERFORMANCE IN NON-LISTED FAMILY FIRMS	1412	10	1.1111111
1	CABRERA-SUÁREZ MK;MART...	2013	TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS AND PERFORMANCE IN NON-LISTED FAMILY FIRMS	1412	10	1.1111111
1	MEMILI E;MISRA K;CHRIS...	2017	INTERNATIONALISATION OF PUBLICLY TRADED FAMILY FIRMS: A TRANSACTION COST THEORY PERSPECTIVE AND LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS	2001	5	1.0000000
1	MEMILI E;MISRA K;CHRIS...	2017	INTERNATIONALISATION OF PUBLICLY TRADED FAMILY FIRMS: A TRANSACTION COST THEORY PERSPECTIVE AND LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS	2001	5	1.0000000
1	MEMILI E;MISRA K;CHRIS...	2017	INTERNATIONALISATION OF PUBLICLY TRADED FAMILY FIRMS: A TRANSACTION COST THEORY PERSPECTIVE AND LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS	2001	5	1.0000000
1	XIAOTI F	2018	INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF QUALITY OF GOVERNMENT AND FAMILY FIRM GOVERNANCE ON R&D OUTPUT: EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON THE LISTED FA...	1471	5	1.2500000
1	XIAOTI F	2018	INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF QUALITY OF GOVERNMENT AND FAMILY FIRM GOVERNANCE ON R&D OUTPUT: EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON THE LISTED FA...	1471	5	1.2500000
1	XIAOTI F	2018	INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF QUALITY OF GOVERNMENT AND FAMILY FIRM GOVERNANCE ON R&D OUTPUT: EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON THE LISTED FA...	1471	5	1.2500000
1	MARTÍNEZ-ROMERO MJ;MAR...	2020	THE INFLUENCE OF SOCIO-EMOTIONAL WEALTH ON FIRM FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM SMALL AND MEDIUM PRIVATELY HELD FAMIL...	2174	3	1.5000000
2	ARSLAN A	2012	IMPACTS OF INSTITUTIONAL PRESSURES AND THE STRENGTH OF MARKET SUPPORTING INSTITUTIONS IN THE HOST COUNTRY ON THE OWNERSHIP...	1088	11	1.1000000
2	TALAY MB;CAVUSGIL ST	2009	CHOICE OF OWNERSHIP MODE IN JOINT VENTURES: AN EVENT HISTORY ANALYSIS FROM THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY	557	11	0.8461538
2	ZHANG Y;ZHONG W;WEN N;...	2014	ASSET SPECIFICITY AND COMPLEMENTARITY AND MNE OWNERSHIP STRATEGIES: THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONAL DISTANCES	573	9	1.1250000
2	ANWAR ST	2010	CFIUS, CHINESE MNCS' OUTWARD FDI, AND GLOBALIZATION OF BUSINESS	573	9	0.7500000
2	ANWAR ST	2010	CFIUS, CHINESE MNCS' OUTWARD FDI, AND GLOBALIZATION OF BUSINESS	573	9	0.7500000
2	ZHANG MM	2015	CROSS-NATIONAL DISTANCE AND INSIDERSHIP WITHIN NETWORKS: JAPANESE MNCS' OWNERSHIP STRATEGIES IN THEIR OVERSEAS SUBSIDIARIES	709	7	1.0000000
2	TSAI MT;CHENG YM	2002	THE DECISION CRITERIA FOR THE OWNERSHIP CONTROL ENTRY MODE FOR TAIWANESE MANUFACTURING FIRMS IN THE UNITED STATES: AN APPL...	280	16	0.8000000
2	CHEN MY;CHANG JY	2011	THE CHOICE OF FOREIGN MARKET ENTRY MODE: AN ANALYSIS OF THE DYNAMIC PROBIT MODEL	439	10	0.9090909
2	KANG Y;LIU Y	2016	NATURAL RESOURCE-SEEKING INTENT AND REGULATORY FORCES: LOCATION CHOICE OF CHINESE OUTWARD FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN ASIA	875	5	0.8333333
2	KANG Y;LIU Y	2016	NATURAL RESOURCE-SEEKING INTENT AND REGULATORY FORCES: LOCATION CHOICE OF CHINESE OUTWARD FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN ASIA	875	5	0.8333333
3	ACHLEITNER AK;KASERER ...	2012	THE DYNAMICS OF VOTING OWNERSHIP IN LONE-FOUNDER, FAMILY-FOUNDER, AND HEIR FIRMS	1058	10	1.0000000
3	ABDULLAH A. AL-DUBAI S...	2014	FAMILY INVOLVEMENT IN OWNERSHIP, MANAGEMENT, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: MODERATING AND DIRECT-EFFECT MODELS	1176	8	1.0000000
3	ABDULLAH A. AL-DUBAI S...	2014	FAMILY INVOLVEMENT IN OWNERSHIP, MANAGEMENT, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: MODERATING AND DIRECT-EFFECT MODELS	1176	8	1.0000000
3	TXOMIN ITURRALDE D;AMA...	2011	INSIDERS OWNERSHIP AND FIRM PERFORMANCE. EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE	1007	8	0.7272727
3	TXOMIN ITURRALDE D;AMA...	2011	INSIDERS OWNERSHIP AND FIRM PERFORMANCE. EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE	1007	8	0.7272727
3	LEITTERSTORF MP;WACHTE...	2016	TAKEOVER PREMIUMS AND FAMILY BLOCKHOLDERS	1114	6	1.0000000
3	LEITTERSTORF MP;WACHTE...	2016	TAKEOVER PREMIUMS AND FAMILY BLOCKHOLDERS	1114	6	1.0000000
3	LEITTERSTORF MP;WACHTE...	2016	TAKEOVER PREMIUMS AND FAMILY BLOCKHOLDERS	1114	6	1.0000000
3	BELOT F;WAXIN T	2017	LABOR CONFLICTS IN FRENCH WORKPLACES: DOES (THE TYPE OF) FAMILY CONTROL MATTER?	1056	6	1.2000000
3	BOZEC Y;BOZEC R;DIA M	2010	OVERALL GOVERNANCE, FIRM VALUE AND DEVIATION FROM ONE SHARE: ONE VOTE PRINCIPLE	710	8	0.6666667
4	GAREL A	2017	WHEN OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE MATTERS: A REVIEW OF THE EFFECTS OF INVESTOR HORIZON ON CORPORATE POLICIES	1551	6	1.2000000
4	GAREL A	2017	WHEN OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE MATTERS: A REVIEW OF THE EFFECTS OF INVESTOR HORIZON ON CORPORATE POLICIES	1551	6	1.2000000
4	FUNG S;TSAI SC	2012	INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP AND CORPORATE INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE	471	7	0.7000000
4	FUNG S;TSAI SC	2012	INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP AND CORPORATE INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE	471	7	0.7000000
4	AMAN H	2011	FIRM-SPECIFIC VOLATILITY OF STOCK RETURNS, THE CREDIBILITY OF MANAGEMENT FORECASTS, AND MEDIA COVERAGE: EVIDENCE FROM JAPA...	263	12	1.0909091
4	HUANG K;PETKEVICH A	2016	INVESTMENT HORIZONS AND INFORMATION	555	5	0.8333333
4	WANG X;WEI S	2019	THE MONITORING ROLE OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS: GEOGRAPHICAL PROXIMITY AND INVESTMENT HORIZON	1092	2	0.6666667
4	WANG X;WEI S	2019	THE MONITORING ROLE OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS: GEOGRAPHICAL PROXIMITY AND INVESTMENT HORIZON	1092	2	0.6666667
4	WANG X;WEI S	2019	THE MONITORING ROLE OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS: GEOGRAPHICAL PROXIMITY AND INVESTMENT HORIZON	1092	2	0.6666667
4	KANG S;CHUNG CY;KIM DS	2019	THE EFFECT OF INSTITUTIONAL BLOCKHOLDERS' SHORT-TERMISM ON FIRM INNOVATION: EVIDENCE FROM THE KOREAN MARKET	652	3	1.0000000
5	REES W;RODIONOVA T	2013	WHAT TYPE OF CONTROLLING INVESTORS IMPACT ON WHICH ELEMENTS OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY?	267	10	1.1111111
5	REES W;RODIONOVA T	2013	WHAT TYPE OF CONTROLLING INVESTORS IMPACT ON WHICH ELEMENTS OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY?	267	10	1.1111111
5	JI YY	2015	TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM PAY STRUCTURE AND CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE	225	7	1.0000000
5	CHOI JH;KIM S;YANG DH	2019	DO MANAGERS PAY CSR FOR PRIVATE MOTIVATION? A DIVIDEND TAX CUT CASE IN KOREA	463	3	1.0000000
5	CHOI JH;KIM S;YANG DH	2019	DO MANAGERS PAY CSR FOR PRIVATE MOTIVATION? A DIVIDEND TAX CUT CASE IN KOREA	463	3	1.0000000
5	TEBINI H;LANG P;M'ZALI...	2014	REVISITING THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL PERFORMANCE ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FROM A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE	406	3	0.3750000
5	HABERMANN F;FISCHER FB	2021	CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE AND THE LIKELIHOOD OF BANKRUPTCY: EVIDENCE FROM A PERIOD OF ECONOMIC UPSWING	577	2	2.0000000
5	LIN HC;WANG CS;WU RS	2017	DOES CORPORATE ETHICS HELP INVESTORS FORECAST FUTURE EARNINGS?	222	5	1.0000000
5	LIN HC;WANG CS;WU RS	2017	DOES CORPORATE ETHICS HELP INVESTORS FORECAST FUTURE EARNINGS?	222	5	1.0000000
5	LEE S;KIM YK;KIM K	2016	CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, FIRM RISK, AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: EVIDENCE FROM KOREAN FIRMS	258	4	0.6666667
6	PASTORE P;TOMMASO S	2016	WOMEN ON CORPORATE BOARDS. THE CASE OF ‘GENDER QUOTAS’ IN ITALY	576	7	1.1666667
6	TLEUBAYEV A;BOBOJONOV ...	2020	BOARD GENDER DIVERSITY AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM THE RUSSIAN AGRI-FOOD INDUSTRY	1214	3	1.5000000
6	AHMAD MA;ALSHBIEL SO	2016	WOMEN IN JORDANIAN BANKS AND PERFORMANCE: FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING MEASUREMENT	703	5	0.8333333
6	REDOR E	2018	GENDER DIVERSITY ON CORPORATE BOARDS: DOES CRITICAL MASS MATTER TO INVESTORS?	671	5	1.2500000
6	VAFAEI A;HENRY D;AHMED...	2020	BOARD DIVERSITY: FEMALE DIRECTOR PARTICIPATION AND CORPORATE INNOVATION	917	3	1.5000000
6	WIELAND S;FLAVEL BS	2015	THE INFLUENCE OF GENDER DIVERSE CORPORATE BOARDS ON EMPLOYEE-ORIENTATION	639	4	0.5714286
6	LIU C	2021	CEO GENDER AND EMPLOYEE RELATIONS: EVIDENCE FROM LABOR LAWSUITS	1196	2	2.0000000
6	LIU C	2021	CEO GENDER AND EMPLOYEE RELATIONS: EVIDENCE FROM LABOR LAWSUITS	1196	2	2.0000000
6	RUBINO FE;TENUTA P;CAM...	2021	FIVE SHADES OF WOMEN: EVIDENCE FROM ITALIAN LISTED FIRMS	985	2	2.0000000
6	YAHYA F;ABBAS G;AHMED ...	2020	RESTRICTIVE AND SUPPORTIVE MECHANISMS FOR FEMALE DIRECTORS’ RISK-AVERSE BEHAVIOR: EVIDENCE FROM SOUTH ASIAN HEALTH CARE IN...	605	3	1.5000000
7	DAVIDKOV TP;YORDANOVA DI	2016	EXPLORING THE BULGARIAN FAMILY SMES' RELUCTANCE TO INTERNATIONALISE	1168	7	1.1666667
7	DAVIDKOV TP;YORDANOVA DI	2016	EXPLORING THE BULGARIAN FAMILY SMES' RELUCTANCE TO INTERNATIONALISE	1168	7	1.1666667
7	DAVIDKOV TP;YORDANOVA DI	2016	EXPLORING THE BULGARIAN FAMILY SMES' RELUCTANCE TO INTERNATIONALISE	1168	7	1.1666667
7	SANCHEZ-FAMOSO V;CANO-...	2019	THE ROLE OF COOPERATION AGREEMENTS IN THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF SPANISH WINERY AND OLIVE OIL FAMILY FIRMS	669	4	1.3333333
7	SANCHEZ-FAMOSO V;CANO-...	2019	THE ROLE OF COOPERATION AGREEMENTS IN THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF SPANISH WINERY AND OLIVE OIL FAMILY FIRMS	669	4	1.3333333
7	SANCHEZ-FAMOSO V;CANO-...	2019	THE ROLE OF COOPERATION AGREEMENTS IN THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF SPANISH WINERY AND OLIVE OIL FAMILY FIRMS	669	4	1.3333333
7	LAFFRANCHINI G;HADJIMA...	2016	THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF FAMILY-FIRMS: A SIGNAL DETECTION APPROACH	394	5	0.8333333
7	LAFFRANCHINI G;HADJIMA...	2016	THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF FAMILY-FIRMS: A SIGNAL DETECTION APPROACH	394	5	0.8333333
7	LAFFRANCHINI G;HADJIMA...	2016	THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF FAMILY-FIRMS: A SIGNAL DETECTION APPROACH	394	5	0.8333333
7	BANNÒ M;TRENTO S	2016	INTERNATIONAL EXPANSION OF FAMILY FIRMS: THE MODERATING ROLE OF SUCCESSORS AND EXTERNAL MANAGERS	642	3	0.5000000

5.1.3

5.1.4 Development

`summarise()` has grouped output by 'com_name'. You can override using the `.groups` argument.

We again see quite some dynamics….

5.1.5 Connectivity between the research areas

Warning: Ignoring unknown parameters: strenght

5.2 Technical description

In a bibliographic coupling network, the coupling-strength between publications is determined by the number of commonly cited references they share, assuming a common pool of references to indicate similarity in context, methods, or theory. Formally, the strength of the relationship between a publication pair \(i\) and \(j\) (\(s_{i,j}^{bib}\)) is expressed by the number of commonly cited references.

\[ s_{i,j}^{bib} = \sum_m c_{i,m} c_{j,m} \]

Since our corpus contains publications which differ strongly in terms of the number of cited references, we normalize the coupling strength by the Jaccard similarity coefficient. Here, we weight the intercept of two publications’ bibliography (shared refeences) by their union (number of all references cited by either \(i\) or \(j\)). It is bounded between zero and one, where one indicates the two publications to have an identical bibliography, and zero that they do not share any cited reference. Thereby, we prevent publications from having high coupling strength due to a large bibliography (e.g., literature surveys).

\[ S_{i,j}^{jac-bib} =\frac{C(i \cap j)}{C(i \cup j)} = \frac{s_{i,j}^{bib}}{c_i + c_j - s_{i,j}^{bib}} \]

More recent articles have a higher pool of possible references to co-cite to, hence they are more likely to be coupled. Consequently, bibliographic coupling represents a forward looking measure, and the method of choice to identify the current knowledge frontier at the point of analysis.

6 Additional analysis

6.1 Authors, Themes & Journals

Warning in rm(M_threefield) : object 'M_threefield' not found

—>